I'm PJ, in Encinitas. If you're an FP&A Manager in financial ops software and your month-end is held together with VLOOKUPs, duct tape, and prayer — I build the thing that actually fixes it.
Yes. Read-only API pulls into a clean warehouse layer. Your ERP stays untouched, your dashboards get real numbers.
Template once, auto-populate from source. I've cut 2-day deck cycles down to 20 minutes. It's the single highest-ROI thing FP&A can automate.
Depends on scale. Under $50M ARR, a custom tool usually wins on cost and flexibility. Over that, platforms earn their keep. I'll tell you straight.
Yes — AR aging, AP schedule, payroll, recurring rev pulled live. Updated automatically, variance vs. forecast tracked weekly.
Python + a simple UI beats 40-tab workbooks every time. Multiple scenarios, no broken links, no "who changed this formula."
Small automations: a few hundred. Full FP&A system: low-to-mid four figures. Text me the problem, I'll quote it the same day.
If two people are comparing the same number from two systems, that's the automation. Always. Start there.
Pick your warehouse (even a Postgres DB works) and pipe everything through it. Dashboards read from one place, not five.
Every recurring journal, accrual, and reclass should trigger itself. Your team reviews — not types.
80% of "why was OpEx up 6%?" is mechanical. A small script drafts the commentary, you edit the nuance.
If your deck requires human assembly, you're still doing last century's FP&A. Template, bind, export. Done.
A $5K custom tool often replaces a $90K analyst hire. Not always — but worth asking before you post the req.