SideGuy · Compliance clarity · reviewed 2026-06-09
In healthcare, both come up — and they're built differently. HITRUST is a prescriptive, scored certification (the CSF) that many hospitals and payers ask for by name. SOC 2 is a flexible attestation where you define the controls. In health-tech, HITRUST often wins the procurement checkbox.
| Dimension | HITRUST | SOC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Prescriptive — the CSF tells you the controls + scores them | Flexible — you scope which controls the report covers |
| Output | A certification (e1 / i1 / r2 levels) valid 1–2 years | An attestation report (Type 1 or Type 2) |
| Healthcare pull | Frequently required by name by hospitals & payers | Accepted, but health buyers often still ask for HITRUST |
| Effort | Higher — prescriptive controls + scoring + assessor | Lower to moderate — you define scope |
| Maps to other frameworks | CSF maps to HIPAA, NIST, ISO, PCI — one cert, many references | Maps to its Trust Services Criteria; add explicit crosswalks |
| Levels | e1 (foundational) → i1 (leading practices) → r2 (expanded/risk-based) | Type 1 (design) → Type 2 (operating) |
You sell to hospitals, health systems, or payers, an RFP names HITRUST, or you want one certification that references HIPAA, NIST, and ISO at once.
You want to move fast and cheap first, your buyers accept SOC 2, or you're not yet deep in regulated healthcare procurement.
Three certification levels of rising rigor: e1 is foundational (essential cybersecurity, ~44 controls), i1 covers leading security practices (~182 controls), and r2 is the expanded, risk-based certification (control count varies by scope). Most start at e1 or i1 and grow into r2.
The HITRUST CSF maps to the HIPAA Security Rule (and NIST, ISO, PCI), so a HITRUST certification references much of HIPAA's technical requirements. It's a common efficient path for health-tech — but you still own HIPAA-specific items like BAAs and breach procedures.
Generally yes — it's prescriptive and scored, so there's less room to scope around gaps. That rigor is exactly why healthcare buyers trust it. SOC 2 is faster to start because you define the scope.
Yes, and the control overlap means a shared evidence program feeds both. Many health-tech firms lead with SOC 2 for speed, then add HITRUST when a hospital or payer requires it.
Written by PJ Zonis · SideGuy Solutions · operator-honest, vendor-neutral · Compliance hub